(no subject)
[Poll #1156924]
ETA: Uh, that last part should be "Meh, not worried ABOUT it." *headdesk*
For more info, the ever-vigilant
valiskeogh posted about the boycott HERE.
ETA: Uh, that last part should be "Meh, not worried ABOUT it." *headdesk*
For more info, the ever-vigilant
no subject
no subject
a 24 hour boycott might work for some people, but if they were dedicated to the cause they would refuse to use LJ in any way until the situation changed. and in all truth, what would 24 hours of a boycott really do?
i think the loudest of the upset users are just that, loud. they don't have the strength of will to leave LJ over this so they will stay away a day and come back and complain more.
people didn't buy LJ to give it away, they saw a way to make a profit and no amount of dissent will make them abandon that basic idea.
no subject
There is a happy balance between profit and customer satisfaction. Many people seem to think the scale has pegged all the way to the evil profit side, while I think this is a minor tip to profit. I certainly can't blame their desire to cut the free sans ad accounts. It is the PR aspect of the secrecy and their creation and then snubbing of the LJ Advisory folks that concerns me as a fellow "businessman" and as a customer.
no subject
i dont even really care in this wanna be fight. i just got tired of people acting like taking 24 hours away from a site on the internet was some strong stand against LJ tyranny. If they really wanted to make a statement they would just leave.
until it costs LJ more to change than stay the same, no whiner 24 hour boycott is going to do anything more than generate a few discussions about the boycott.
being able to shoot oneself in the foot is a danger, but a right, in capitalism.
no subject
"boring." -- Jim Norton